Kanidmvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kanidm | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 67/100 for Kanidm, so it is the safer default.
Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.
Kanidm details →woodpecker-ci details →