JupyterLabvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JupyterLab | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 | 93 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +1 264 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.6.5 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for JupyterLab.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).
JupyterLab details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep JupyterLab, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with