juice-shopvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| juice-shop | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 78 in Security | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 280 | 118 160 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +5 801 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v20.3.0 · 11 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for juice-shop, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for juice-shop.
If you want the quickest setup, juice-shop is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 801 stars in 30 days).
juice-shop details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep juice-shop, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with