JoplinvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 56 917 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Joplin is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+437 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with