JoplinvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 56 916 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with