Joplinvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 56 910 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +434 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.21 · 25 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+434 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with