Joomla!vsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joomla! | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 157 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | 6.2.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Joomla! scores 74/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Joomla! ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Joomla! is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Joomla! is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
Joomla! details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Joomla!, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with