Umbraco CMSvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Umbraco CMS | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 278 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 9 |
| Latest release | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Umbraco CMS details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with