JmalCloudvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JmalCloud | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 65 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +315 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
JmalCloud details →nocodb details →