JmalCloudvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JmalCloud | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 132 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +3 224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1462 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
JmalCloud details →llama.cpp details →