Jitsi MeetvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jitsi Meet | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 33 in Communication | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 30 160 | 82 326 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +3 310 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 79/100 for Jitsi Meet, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Jitsi Meet.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Jitsi Meet needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 310 stars in 30 days).
Jitsi Meet details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep Jitsi Meet, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with