jenkinsvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jenkins | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 26 704 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +123 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 1 |
| Latest release | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; jenkins needs more configuration.
jenkins details →Workout.cool details →