jenkinsvsOpenBrief
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jenkins | OpenBrief | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in CI/CD | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 26 705 | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 1 |
| Latest release | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; jenkins needs more configuration.
jenkins is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
jenkins details →OpenBrief details →