JellyfinvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jellyfin | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 772 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 298 | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Jellyfin.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.
Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 298 stars in 30 days).
Jellyfin details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep Jellyfin, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with