Jellyfin-Auto-CollectionsvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jellyfin-Auto-Collections | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #78 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 286 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 46/100 for Jellyfin-Auto-Collections, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Jellyfin-Auto-Collections.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Jellyfin-Auto-Collections needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
Jellyfin-Auto-Collections details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Jellyfin-Auto-Collections, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with