Janus WebRTC ServervsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 41 150 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +2 936 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 71/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 936 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with