Janus WebRTC ServervsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 5 611 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +134 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Janus WebRTC Server scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with