issue-statusvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| issue-status | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 429 | 38 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 47/100 for issue-status, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, issue-status is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
issue-status details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep issue-status, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with