iptv-proxyvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| iptv-proxy | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 736 | 61 535 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +491 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 55/100 for iptv-proxy, so it is the safer default.
iptv-proxy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, iptv-proxy is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+491 stars in 30 days).
iptv-proxy details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep iptv-proxy, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with