copypartyvsiptv-proxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | iptv-proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #24 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 153 | 736 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +380 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.7.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 55/100 for iptv-proxy, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for iptv-proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, iptv-proxy is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+380 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →iptv-proxy details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep iptv-proxy, compare it with