iptv-proxyvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| iptv-proxy | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 736 | 92 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 929 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 55/100 for iptv-proxy, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for iptv-proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, iptv-proxy is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).
iptv-proxy details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep iptv-proxy, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with