IPFS Web UIvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 2 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Zot Registry details →