IPFS Web UIvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Tube Archivist details →