IPFS Web UIvsKomga
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Komga | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #6 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 6 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +105 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Kotlin |
Which one should you pick?
Komga scores 73/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Komga needs more configuration.
Komga is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Komga details →