ADAMANT IPFS NodevsSonatype Nexus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ADAMANT IPFS Node | Sonatype Nexus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 2 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 30 |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Sonatype Nexus scores 64/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonatype Nexus is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
Sonatype Nexus is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
ADAMANT IPFS Node details →Sonatype Nexus details →
Swap a project
Keep ADAMANT IPFS Node, compare it with
Keep Sonatype Nexus, compare it with