ADAMANT IPFS NodevsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ADAMANT IPFS Node | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 61 544 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +482 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
ADAMANT IPFS Node details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep ADAMANT IPFS Node, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with