InvokeAIvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 903 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +623 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+623 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with