Text Generation WebUIvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with