InvokeAIvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 903 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +623 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; SandBase Harness needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+623 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →SandBase Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep SandBase Harness, compare it with