InvokeAIvsmicroclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | microclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 28 902 | 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +622 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 20 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v0.11.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 52/100 for microclaw, so it is the safer default.
microclaw ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; microclaw needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+622 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →microclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep microclaw, compare it with