InvokeAIvsJanus WebRTC Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | Janus WebRTC Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #9 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 911 | 9 197 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +625 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →Janus WebRTC Server details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with