Janus WebRTC Servervssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Janus WebRTC Server and sdnext score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Janus WebRTC Server details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with