InvidiousvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 25 800 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 029 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Crystal | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 80/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Invidious needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 029 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with