InvidiousvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Crystal | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 81/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with