InvidiousvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 | 470 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.11.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Crystal | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 81/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.
If you want the quickest setup, Invidious is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with