InvidiousvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 25 803 | 712 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 032 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Crystal | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 80/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, Invidious is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 032 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with