InvidiousvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Crystal | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 81/100 for Invidious, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with