InvidiousvsPortainer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Zlib |
| Main language | Crystal | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 81/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; Invidious needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →Portainer details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep Portainer, compare it with