Infisicalvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 30 123 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +707 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical details →uptime-kuma details →