InfisicalvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 109 | 95 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +710 | +2 348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 348 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →Stirling-PDF details →