Infisicalvsjenkins
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 30 106 | 26 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +707 | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 32 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 32 for jenkins.
If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →jenkins details →