imgproxyvsWhisper-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | Whisper-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 11 162 | 2 900 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
imgproxy scores 72/100 against 62/100 for Whisper-WebUI, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whisper-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; Whisper-WebUI needs more configuration.
imgproxy is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).
imgproxy details →Whisper-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep Whisper-WebUI, compare it with