imgproxyvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
imgproxy details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with