illa-buildervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →TradingAgents details →