illa-buildervsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →Scada-LTS details →