illa-buildervsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 20 028 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.
Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →Qinglong details →