illa-buildervsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +40 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
OpenMapTiles ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenMapTiles is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
OpenMapTiles is growing faster right now (+40 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →OpenMapTiles details →