ifmvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ifm | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 370 | 93 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 012 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 35 |
| Latest release | v4.1.2 · 20 Aug 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for ifm, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ifm.
If you want the quickest setup, ifm is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).
ifm details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep ifm, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with