ifmvsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ifm | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 370 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.1.2 · 20 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 49/100 for ifm, so it is the safer default.
ifm ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, ifm is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
ifm details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep ifm, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with