HyperSwitchvszoneless
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | zoneless | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 10 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 45 506 | 573 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v0.1.0 · 23 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 50/100 for zoneless, so it is the safer default.
HyperSwitch ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for zoneless.
If you want the quickest setup, zoneless is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →zoneless details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep zoneless, compare it with